:: gas for less/zapped/erotic landscape/strength and fear ::
by Andrew, FogBaron, joaomartins, and wotty
::| an.exquisite.corpse : discussion : 50 |::
This one starts out very innocent but decends rather quickly into some kinky debauchery!
I think I like it!
Zabet at July 12, 2005 6:57 AM
Very sexy with all the red and nakedness. I didn't know the National Geographic girl was into all that.
smd71 at July 12, 2005 7:01 AM
Egads, chili pepper porn. I like this.
enclosed at July 12, 2005 7:25 AM
It's funny because I always get gas when I eat chili peppers.
Also, I like boobies.
Heroin McEcstacy at July 12, 2005 7:28 AM
I'm starting to think that An Exquisite Corpse is made up mostly of 15 year old boys.
Miss Daze at July 12, 2005 7:43 AM
Kind of makes feel like a voyeur....looking through the windows and seeing what Really goes on.
As for 15 year old boys, yeah, I know some grown men who also act like that.
Wild...... at July 12, 2005 7:54 AM
I resemble that remark...
FogBaron at July 12, 2005 9:45 AM
well spotted smd71, that is the national geographic girl hiding in the shadows on the right.
I was a bit worried about my contribution to this corpse but now it's finished I think it fits rather well
ps I'm a bit older than 15 ;)
wotty at July 12, 2005 11:02 AM
I'm starting to think that exquisite corpses are made up by 2 distinct groups of people.
1. 15 year old boys.
2. Those who are not 15 year old boys.
Discuss.
Heroin McEcstacy at July 12, 2005 11:32 AM
I used to be a 15 year old boy, but i'm not any more. Does that mean i fall into both catagories?
bone at July 12, 2005 11:47 AM
Ok, but I'm just giving you fair warning that I have a sweet pure lovely little corpse slice floating around out there and if she ends up defiled I'm going to be calling someone's mom!
Herion, are you really saying that EC is divided by gender? If so, then there is your answer, Bone. Well, I would assume...
Miss Daze at July 12, 2005 12:10 PM
No I was making a joke by creating two groups that absolutely everybody falls into - I just happened to use 15 year old boys since that's what we were talking about.
I don't like to divide stuff or people like that. We are all figments of the same sick imagination.
One of the beautiful things about corpsing is that after you create your piece you then give up your control 100%. This is a sublime metaphysical metaphor. The more you try to control things the more you realize that you're acting out a feeling of lacking control.
There are two types of people I despise:
-people who judge other cultures and ethnicitys, and the Dutch.
Heroin McEcstacy at July 12, 2005 1:07 PM
some of the content on this site is not appropriate for those under 18, even though probably much of that sort of content is no doubt created by those who are under 18.
hasfurrychildren at July 12, 2005 1:11 PM
some of the content on this site is not appropriate for those under 18, even though probably much of that sort of content is no doubt created by those who are under 18.
funniest post ever
Heroin McEcstacy at July 12, 2005 3:45 PM
no way! your posts are always the funniest. [ fact ]
hasfurrychildren at July 12, 2005 6:03 PM
Well… I should probably try to perform some kind of acrobatic apology now, since it's quite clear that the "rated" material in this specific corpse reaches high levels of saturation im my specific slice…
But I won't.
I can just say that I'm not a 15 year old boy, but at the time I made that slice, my graphic "trigger" was that innocent looking red chilli pepper… all that followed was a consequence of that primal choice.
Free flow of ideas is a very dangerous thing.
But I never meant to be ofensive— I'm too much of a coward for that.
Was I?
João Martins at July 12, 2005 6:26 PM
I love your use of th chili pepper, Joao. Nothing pornographic about it. That's the way I eat my chili's. And I'm more than 15+15+15.
Fiddler at July 12, 2005 7:05 PM
Aw shucks, I don't see any porno in here, National Geographic maybe.
Wild...... at July 12, 2005 7:26 PM
Risque content is like text. A little here and there never hurt anyone, but it would be annoying if everyone did it all the time.
I personally think the current pace is ok.
Shae at July 12, 2005 8:05 PM
the pepper sucking woman is suggestive.
as is the creamy white sauce.
overall, the sexual references are minimal here.
it's just we all do need to consider that there's more than one minor amongst us. websites have been shut down when sexual references/images & minors are combined.
that's all i mean. just something to think about.
hasfurrychildren at July 12, 2005 8:35 PM
sexuality = part of life. need we be reminded that our surrealist forbears in this game embraced and celebrated the human form? think man ray, think dali! all qualitative issues aside, this here is ART, my friends. let's censor ourselves, and while we're at it hire some guards to keep children out of the museums of the world, for fear they should see the David or the Birth of Venus in all their glory!
good. there. thought about it. decided to totally disregard it. done. onward!
unapologetic at July 12, 2005 10:32 PM
myself, i have no issues with sexuality themed content.
on the other hand i am not so fond of tawdry junevile "oh lookie a penis!" shock value sort of content. but that's i suppose is a matter of different tastes.
i was just mentioning the fact due to that a few minors do participate on this site. do you get what i'm trying to say?
it could become a legality kind of issue if the content goes too far down the gutter.
hasfurrychildren at July 12, 2005 11:08 PM
"myself, i have no issues with sexuality themed content."
and then:
"it could become a legality kind of issue if the content goes too far down the gutter."
Huh. Sounds like an issue...
FogBaron at July 12, 2005 11:56 PM
*throws in towel*
hasfurrychildren at July 13, 2005 12:19 AM
How in the hell did this get so out of hand? What I was joking around about was this "i like boobies" attitude. It IS a matter of taste. And I doubt if anyone cares if you guys play with yourselves. There is nothing pornographic about the female body, only in the way it is sometimes used. That is why children are allowed into museums, but not into x-rated movies. I'm not anti-porn and there is much that is considered porn by many that I would consider beautiful. Still there is a difference between art and smut - that I can't really describe it but I know it when I see it kinda things, ya know? And I don't even know why I'm discussing this because that wasn't even the issue I was referring to....
One very true point is that some parental unit may eventually track down junior's extracurricular activities and give Phineas an earful, if not more. But that is neither here nor there, now is it? Fact of life: adults do have to "self-censor" when there are children around, especially if they are someone else's children. Hasn't anyone ever shoved down your throat how precious their dear children are? And how we, the rest of the world, have to protect them! jeez.
Miss Daze at July 13, 2005 12:22 AM
As a responsible parent and headmistress, I AM inclined to report people who support such suggestive material for underage minors to view and/or salivate over. It is even worse that you encourage this behaviour and visual style as a creative outlet.
PS: I'm Dutch.
Very Strict Headmistress at July 13, 2005 12:33 AM
Haahahhaaaaaahahha!!!!!
Now THAT is funny, MIss Very Strict Headmistress.
Miss Daze at July 13, 2005 12:38 AM
i am the dutchess of york. :P
i have consulted the queen.
the queen & the dutch rule.
hasfurrychildren at July 13, 2005 12:50 AM
I am addressed as MS Very Strict Headmistress!
Very Strict Headmistress at July 13, 2005 12:57 AM
Only if you don't view Smut as Art.
Very Strict Headmistress at July 13, 2005 12:59 AM
a Ms. Very Strict Headmistress after my own heart.
hasfurrychildren at July 13, 2005 1:02 AM
*grabs back towel*
i just can't waste a perfectly good towel.
*washes towel with lots of bleach*
hasfurrychildren at July 13, 2005 1:09 AM
Does this mean I am not the Queen of Hearts? Well, fancy that!
So, Microsoft Very Strict Headmistress, are you art smart?
Miss Daze at July 13, 2005 1:12 AM
oh Miss Daze, such a dramatic queen, you will always be the queen of hearts.
MicrosSucks VSM! BWAHAHAHAHA (sorry to laugh at your expense VSM. i am naughty sometimes.)
hasfurrychildren at July 13, 2005 1:18 AM
IMO there is no art vs porn debate
the old masters painted naked women because they knew the paintings would sell because the naked female form is very nice to look at, end of story!
should art be censored? no way!
art is a creative expression by the artist and if you don't like it, don't look at it.
if you don't want your children looking at it then don't let them but don't try to stop any artist from exploring the boundaries because you have no control.
I don't want to live in a "nanny state" where everything is nice and safe and we are all told what we can and can't do in all aspects of our life.
if art is seen as pornographic or violent then that is a symptom of the current society not the cause.
you will be pleased to know that the next 2 sections that I have contributed have no nudes in them but that was because I just didn't feel a need for a nude in those pieces although I may in my next contribution
wotty at July 13, 2005 6:07 AM
Ok, not that you need another opinion on this thread (which really makes me wish the forum was working properly), but I don't think we've had anything on this site that even comes into the same zip code as prosecutable indecency. I'm sure this dissapoints some of us. I mean you.
And for the record, I've never gotten an actual complaint about content for any of the 300 or so Corpses here. And if I got one now, I might never stop laughing.
Phineas at July 13, 2005 6:26 AM
Wotty, I don't know who you are talking to. We can all live in our own little magic kingdom/queendom if we like but the rest of the world is what it is. And there are lots and lots of people out there who do want a "nanny" state. That is basically who we were referring to...or at least I was and I believe furry was too. Maybe you are not aware of the large amount of parents out there who do not keep an eye on their kids then blame everyone else for what their dear little ones are being exposed to. I think it is idiotic, but it exists, like it or not.
And the porn/art debate has been going on for ages, it is endless. I have yet to see anything that I would consider pornographic on here, but I could always add something. Anyone like clowns?
Miss Daze at July 13, 2005 7:09 AM
Oh! Probably talking to air by this point. Anyway, just wanted to add that the old master's also painted a whole bunch of nekkid guys. And men will always get defensive over their "right" to look at Boobies. If it is "art" or not has nothing to do with it.
Miss Daze at July 13, 2005 7:29 AM
Wotty, my quite young and oblivious boy. Your nudies are quite poetic, it is joaomartin's centerpiece 'innocent looking red chilli pepper' that is naively stuffed between the gal's oral cavity that requires debate on prosecutable indecency for the eyes of 15 year olds to be encouraged to eyeball. Are YOU blushing dear?
Very Strict Headmistress at July 13, 2005 7:34 AM
Miss Daze, I'm just stating my opinion on the art/porn debate, as this corpse seems to have brought the subject out into the light of day.
if a parent allows their child to view unsuitable material then it is the parent's fault and any parent that tries to pass the blame by seeking a law suit against the artist/host of the material in question should be charged with neglect.
as for the old masters' paintings and sculptures of nekkid guys, I think you will find that a lot of them were labours of love. and anyway, there are (and always has been) a lot of people in this world that like to look at naked men and if they are willing to pay there will be someone to provide them with something to look at
wotty at July 13, 2005 9:20 AM
Ms Very Strict Headmistress, thank you for botht he compliments as I am a lot further past 15 than I would like to be and for mentioning nude and poetic in a sentence about me :D
in this hot weather I think most 15 year old boys are going to be more worked up over the 15/16 year old girls eating ice lollies than they are about a picture of someone eating a chilli pepper in a sugestive way.
and as a side note, there have been so many mentions of the word porn that all the kids whose parents use AOL, with its inbuilt safety features, wont be able to view the page anyway LOL
wotty at July 13, 2005 9:28 AM
is this the most talked aboutcorpse ever? who knows,not me thats for sure but i do know that boobies rock and have rocked ever since i was old enough to notice these magnificent female attributes
but boobies are not porn and anyway porn is not porn when it's black and white and a chilli pepper is definatley just a chilli pepper no matter how well you suck it.
besides any one who sucks chillis is just asking for a mouthful of pain.
unless there jalapenos because there just for girls. now a nice scotch bonnet thats a mans chilli, but then again i don't know if sucking a mans chilli is an appropriate issue to be discussing in an arty conversation like this because thats just smutty.
bone at July 13, 2005 10:43 AM
What a clever boy Wotty - two gold stars for mentioning the word Porn four times to protect children a little younger than yourself through AOL. Bone - you have talked yourself into a corner, glad you realise the smutty aspect to your words however you are to remain in the corner until further notice.
Very Strict Headmistress at July 13, 2005 5:11 PM
Off to the corner i go.
will there be lines later or possibly a detention?
How strict are you? please punish me...
Do you have a cane?
bone at July 14, 2005 7:59 AM
BEHAVE Bone!!!!! (It's a paddle)
Very Strict Headmistress at July 14, 2005 8:35 AM
can't stop laughing
wotty at July 14, 2005 5:55 PM
This is a SERIOUS matter Wotty ... I will take those gold stars away and you can join Bone unless you keep your snickers to YOURSELF!
Very Strict Headmistress at July 14, 2005 6:26 PM
there is an answer to that that would get me in so much more trouble that I'm almost tempted but some would use that answer as evidence that the site of a nude female has a negative effect upon the male mind and should therefore be cencored so I shall keep my gold stars on my copybook and my mouth shut.
although it is very very tempting ;)
wotty at July 15, 2005 8:56 AM
I'm new to the site, and have a question. Is it still plagiarism if it's part of a photo mosaic? Are there rules against using another's artwork in a corpse without giving them credit?
Other than that I only have one comment: the stretched out face at the bottom looks suprisingly similar to Hugh Grant.
gutistg at July 21, 2005 1:28 AM
Any use on this site is, as far as I can tell, Fair Use. There's already been some discussion of this in the Forum.
Phineas at July 21, 2005 6:29 AM
Post a comment
An Exquisite Corpse is a collaborative experiment in the creation of visual art through the tapping of the collective unconscious...
{ read more }